For conventional and electric vehicles tested in a standard chassis dynamometer environment precise regulations on the evaluation of their... Show moreFor conventional and electric vehicles tested in a standard chassis dynamometer environment precise regulations on the evaluation of their energy performance exist. However, the regulations do not include requirements on the confidence value to associate with the results. As vehicles become more and more efficient to meet the stricter regulations mandates on emissions, fuel and energy consumption, traditional testing methods may become insufficient to validate these improvements, and may need revision. Without information about the accuracy associated with the results of those procedures however, adjustments and improvements are not possible, since no frame of reference exists. For connected and automated vehicles, there are no standard testing procedures, and researchers are still in the process of determining if current evaluation methods can be extended to test intelligent technologies and which metrics best represent their performance. For these vehicles is even more important to determine the uncertainty associated with these experimental methods and how they propagate to the final results. The work presented in this dissertation focuses on the development of a systematic framework for the evaluation of the uncertainty associated with the energy performance of conventional, electric and automated vehicles. The framework is based on a known statistical method, to determine the uncertainty associated with the different stages and processes involved in the experimental testing, and to evaluate how the accuracy of each parameter involved impacts the final results. The results demonstrate that the framework can be successfully applied to existing testing methods and provides a trustworthy value of accuracy to associate with the energy performance results, and can be easily extended to connected-automated vehicle testing to evaluate how novel experimental methods impact the accuracy and the confidence of the outputs. The framework can be easily be implemented into an existing laboratory environment to incorporate the uncertainty evaluation among the current results analyzed at the end of each test, and provide a reference for researchers to evaluate the actual benefits of new algorithms and optimization methods and understand margins for improvements, and by regulators to assess which parameters to enforce to ensure compliance and ensure projected benefits. Show less
