Search results

(1 - 1 of 1)

Title

An Alternative Approach for the Jefferson Lab Electron-Ion Collider Ion Accelerator Complex

Creator

Martinez Marin, Jose Luis

Date

2020

Description

An assessment by the National Academy of Sciences (NAS) of the scientific merit for a future Electron Ion Collider (EIC) in the US concluded...
Show moreAn assessment by the National Academy of Sciences (NAS) of the scientific merit for a future Electron Ion Collider (EIC) in the US concluded that such a facility would be unique in the world and enable indispensable research on current and compelling scientific questions. This assessment confirmed the recommendations of the 2015 Nuclear Science Advisory Committee (NSAC) for an EIC with highly polarized beams of electrons and ions, sufficient luminosity and sufficient, variable center-of-mass energy. Proposals were requested for a cost-effective design that uses existing accelerator infrastructure to reduce the risk; one of two major proposals submitted for consideration originated from the Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility (JLab). The Jefferson Laboratory Electron-Ion Collider (JLEIC) would use the Continuous Electron Beam Accelerator Facility (CEBAF) at JLab as a full-energy electron injector. The primary accelerator challenges are twofold: producing and maintaining a high degree of polarization for both beams, and achieving high luminosity. This thesis project was part of an effort to produce an alternative, low-risk and cost- effective design for the JLEIC ion complex. The primary goal was not to find a replacement for the JLEIC ion complex design, but rather to investigate alternative options for the different components of the ion complex that could lower the overall cost, reduce its footprint, mitigate risk, and identify possible staging or future upgrades of the project. The platform for this thesis was the alternative design for the JLEIC ion complex that included (1) a more compact ion linac, (2) two staged ion boosters instead of one before injection to the collider ring, with a more compact and lower energy Pre-Booster ring as the first stage, and (3) the dual use of the electron storage ring (e-ring) as a second stage ion Large Booster.The alternative design was first investigated for medium energy (65-GeV center-of-mass), and was then upgraded following the National Academy of Sciences (NAS) review to higher energy (100-GeV center-of-mass). Developing a more cost-effective design and meeting all the requirements is challenging due to several constraints imposed on the alternative approach -- for example, the use of only room-temperature magnets for both ion boosters. There are also space limitations, the need to keep the shape and crossing angle of the ion Large Booster the same as the collider ring, ensuring reasonable length and aperture requirements for the magnets, and avoiding transition crossing for all the rings, which can cause beam dilution and instabilities.Development of both the Medium-Energy and the High-Energy options is presented. The Medium-Energy option consists of a 135 MeV injector linac, a 3 GeV octagonally-shaped Pre-Booster ring and a 11 GeV Large Booster. The High-Energy option consists of a 150 MeV (~ 40 MeV/u for Pb) injector linac, a 8 GeV (~ 2.04 GeV/u for Pb) non figure-8 Pre-Booster ring and a 40 GeV proton (~ 16 GeV/u for Pb) Large Booster, which would also serve as the electron storage ring (e-ring). The figure-8 shape of the Large Booster helps to maintain high polarization. High luminosity is achieved following a strategy to have a high bunch repetition rate of the colliding beams, very short bunch lengths, and small transverse emittances; the main concern here is to provide a lattice that is consistent with these requirements. The main results reported are the lattice design optimization and consolidation, benchmarking of the beam optics with different codes such as ELEGANT, COSY-Infinity, MAD-X, TRACE-3D, and Zgoubi, and spin resonance simulation results. Spin dynamics studies were performed for the linac and the Pre-Booster, and mechanisms to preserve the polarization are proposed. Beam formation and non-linear effects such as chromaticity, space charge, and intra-beam scattering were also studied to gain understanding of how the alternative approach could affect the baseline beam formation scheme and to ensure that the beam requirements are met through the injector chain with this alternative approach. It was shown that the polarization can be preserved through the alternative ion complex even with the more compact linac and a Pre-Booster that does not have a figure-8 shape by using a sufficiently long spin correction solenoid in the linac and a partial Siberian snake in the Pre-Booster. The baseline beam formation scheme could still be used to reach the required beam characteristics for collider injection. Cooling is not needed in the more compact Pre-Booster, and the large, higher energy booster helps to avoid space charge effects at extraction. This study has confirmed the effectiveness of the alternative approach as concerns the optics, acceleration, polarization, and beam formation. The ion injectors are sufficiently compact, and the ion Large Booster size and shape are consistent with the e-ring requirements, enabling the desired dual functionality of that machine. This work created a basis for design discussions during the JLEIC design process. The final High-Energy design for the JLEIC ion complex adopted design features that came from the alternative design studies, which were derived in part from this work—in particular, the shorter, lower-energy linac, the use of two boosters in the injection chain before the collider ring, and the ability to have only room-temperature magnets in the boosters, with superconducting magnets used only in for the collider ring.
Show less