<?xml version='1.0' encoding='utf-8'?>
<mods xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" version="3.7" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3 http://www.loc.gov/standards/mods/v3/mods-3-7.xsd">
  <titleInfo>
    <title>MEDIA AND PROCTORING EFFECTS ON THE MEASUREMENT EQUIVALENCE OF THREE PERSONALITY SCALES</title>
  </titleInfo>
  <name>
    <role>
      <roleTerm type="text" authority="marcrelator" authorityURI="http://id.loc.gov/vocabulary/relators" valueURI="http://id.loc.gov/vocabulary/relators/cre">creator</roleTerm>
    </role>
    <namePart>Sawhney, Gargi</namePart>
  </name>
  <name authority="wikidata" authorityURI="https://www.wikidata.org" valueURI="https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q132128889">
    <role>
      <roleTerm type="text" authority="marcrelator" authorityURI="http://id.loc.gov/vocabulary/relators" valueURI="http://id.loc.gov/vocabulary/relators/ths">advisor</roleTerm>
    </role>
    <namePart>Cigularov, Konstantin</namePart>
  </name>
  <abstract>Due to the increased use of technology in administering psychological measures, there has been a growing interest in establishing measurement equivalence of personality measures across paper-and-pencil and computer-based conditions. The present study examined the measurement equivalence of three personality measures across three administration conditions: paper-and-pencil proctored, computer-based proctored, and computer-based non-proctored. Participants were 415 undergraduate students, who were randomly assigned to the three conditions and completed measures of competitiveness, engagement, and pride in productivity. Adequate fit was found for a three-factor measurement model within each of the three conditions. Results from multi-group confirmatory factor analysis indicated good configural, metric, and scalar equivalence, as well as invariant uniqueness across the three conditions. Practically speaking, observed means can be compared across the paper-and-pencil, computer-based proctored and computer-based non-proctored conditions. Results of this study are consistent with previous research that showed support for measurement equivalence across paper-and-pencil and computer-based modes of administration. Future research with larger samples and employees should attempt to extend our findings to high-stake contexts, such as employment settings.</abstract>
  <note type="provenance">Submitted by Dana Lamparello (dlampare@iit.edu) on 2012-02-29T16:49:29Z No. of bitstreams: 2 Sawhney_Master's_Thesis_New_GS_36_050911.pdf: 791156 bytes, checksum: 764e2310994735ca93e9b47e82fa1a71 (MD5) Thesis_first_page_approved_GS_1_050911.pdf: 247622 bytes, checksum: b7940f75a8aaac3039d20834323a5cbb (MD5)</note>
  <note type="provenance">Made available in DSpace on 2012-02-29T16:49:29Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 2 Sawhney_Master's_Thesis_New_GS_36_050911.pdf: 791156 bytes, checksum: 764e2310994735ca93e9b47e82fa1a71 (MD5) Thesis_first_page_approved_GS_1_050911.pdf: 247622 bytes, checksum: b7940f75a8aaac3039d20834323a5cbb (MD5) Previous issue date: 2011-05</note>
  <note type="thesis">M.S. in Psychology, May 2011</note>
  <originInfo>
    <dateCaptured>2011-05-09</dateCaptured>
  </originInfo>
  <originInfo>
    <dateCreated keyDate="yes">2011-05</dateCreated>
  </originInfo>
  <identifier type="hdl">http://hdl.handle.net/10560/2528</identifier>
  <language>
    <languageTerm type="code" authority="rfc3066">en</languageTerm>
  </language>
  <typeOfResource authority="coar" valueURI="http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_46ec">Thesis</typeOfResource>
  <physicalDescription>
    <digitalOrigin>born digital</digitalOrigin>
    <internetMediaType>application/pdf</internetMediaType>
  </physicalDescription>
  <accessCondition type="useAndReproduction" displayLabel="rightsstatements.org">In Copyright</accessCondition>
  <accessCondition type="useAndReproduction" displayLabel="rightsstatements.orgURI">http://rightsstatements.org/page/InC/1.0/</accessCondition>
  <accessCondition type="restrictionOnAccess">Restricted Access</accessCondition>
  <name type="corporate">
    <namePart>PSYCH / Institute of Psychology</namePart>
    <affiliation>Illinois Institute of Technology</affiliation>
    <role>
      <roleTerm type="text">Affiliated department</roleTerm>
    </role>
  </name>
</mods>