creator Daisley, Rebecca Roller advisor Mead, Alan The current study examined whether information about the job simulation portion of a selection assessment battery is more susceptible to a test security threat than more traditional assessments, where test security is threatened when assessment content is shared. Participants were asked to play the role of a job candidate for a customer service representative. They were given three assessments: a cognitive ability test, a personality inventory, and a job simulation. After completing the assessments, participants were asked to write an e-mail to a hypothetical friend who will also be applying for the job, and include any information that would help their friend in the application process. It was hypothesized that the most information and the most useful information shared by participants would be about the job simulation portion of the assessment battery. The findings supported the hypotheses, suggesting that job simulations are more susceptible to information sharing by applicants than the other assessments, and therefore are exposed to a greater test security threat. The discussion includes implications for practice. Submitted by Erma Thomas (thomase@iit.edu) on 2016-03-30T18:19:24Z No. of bitstreams: 1 etdadmin_upload_394164.zip: 1576323 bytes, checksum: 2289db1d044e56987062e5c93340bc90 (MD5) Made available in DSpace on 2016-03-30T18:19:24Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 etdadmin_upload_394164.zip: 1576323 bytes, checksum: 2289db1d044e56987062e5c93340bc90 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2015-12 Ph.D. in Psychology, December 2015 2015 2015-12 http://hdl.handle.net/10560/3770 en Job Simulation Personnel Selection Simulation Test Security Test Security Threat Dissertation born digital application/pdf In Copyright http://rightsstatements.org/page/InC/1.0/ Restricted Access PSYCH / Institute of Psychology Illinois Institute of Technology Affiliated department