
<oai_dc:dc xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
  <dc:title>Independence and Graphical Models for Fitting Real Data</dc:title>
  <dc:creator>Cho, Jason Y.</dc:creator>
  <dc:subject>Mathematics</dc:subject>
  <dc:subject>Fisher</dc:subject>
  <dc:subject>Graphical</dc:subject>
  <dc:subject>Hypothesis</dc:subject>
  <dc:subject>Likelihood</dc:subject>
  <dc:subject>Metropolis</dc:subject>
  <dc:subject>Statistical model</dc:subject>
  <dc:description>Given some real life dataset where the attributes of the dataset take on categorical values, with corresponding r(1) × r(2) × … × r(m) contingency table with nonzero rows or nonzero columns, we will be testing the goodness-of-fit of various independence models to the dataset using a variation of Metropolis-Hastings that uses Markov bases as a tool to get a Monte Carlo estimate of the p-value. This variation of Metropolis-Hastings can be found in Algorithm 3.1.1. Next we will consider the problem: ``out of all possible undirected graphical models each associated to some graph with m vertices that we test to fit on our dataset, which one best fits the dataset?&quot; Here, the m attributes are labeled as vertices for the graph. We would have to conduct 2^(mC2) goodness-of-fit tests since there are 2^(mC2) possible undirected graphs on m vertices. Instead, we consider a backwards selection method likelihood-ratio test algorithm. We first start with the complete graph G = K(m), and call the corresponding undirected graphical model ℳ(G) as the parent model. Then for each edge e in E(G), we repeatedly apply the likelihood-ratio test to test the relative fit of the model ℳ(G-e), the child model, vs. ℳ(G), the parent model, where ℳ(G-e) ⊆ℳ(G). More details on this iterative process can be found in Algorithm 4.1.3. For our dataset, we will be using the alcohol dataset found in https://www.kaggle.com/datasets/sooyoungher/smoking-drinking-dataset, where the four attributes of the dataset we will use are ``Gender&quot; (male, female), ``Age&quot;, ``Total cholesterol (mg/dL)&quot;, and ``Drinks alcohol or not?&quot;. After testing the goodness-of-fit of three independence models corresponding to the independence statements ``Gender vs Drink or not?&quot;, ``Age vs Drink or not?&quot;, and &quot;Total cholesterol vs Drink or not?&quot;, we found that the data came from a distribution from the two independence models corresponding to``Age vs Drink or not?&quot; and &quot;Total cholesterol vs Drink or not?&quot; And after applying the backwards selection likelihood-ratio method on the alcohol dataset, we found that the data came from a distribution from the undirected graphical model associated to the complete graph minus the edge {``Total cholesterol”, ``Drink or not?”}.</dc:description>
  <dc:contributor>Kaul, Hemanshu</dc:contributor>
  <dc:date>2023</dc:date>
  <dc:type>Thesis</dc:type>
  <dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format>
  <dc:identifier>islandora:1025414</dc:identifier>
  <dc:source></dc:source>
  <dc:source>Illinois Institute of Technology</dc:source>
  <dc:source>MATH / Applied Mathematics</dc:source>
  <dc:source></dc:source>
  <dc:language>en</dc:language>
  <dc:rights>In
                Copyright</dc:rights>
  <dc:rights>http://rightsstatements.org/page/InC/1.0/</dc:rights>
  <dc:rights>Restricted Access</dc:rights>
</oai_dc:dc>
