<?xml version="1.0"?>
<mods xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:xs="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:mods="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3" version="3.7" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3 http://www.loc.gov/standards/mods/v3/mods-3-7.xsd">
  <titleInfo>
    <title>“I’d have to vote against you”: Issue Campaigning via Twitter</title>
  </titleInfo>
  <name>
    <role>
      <roleTerm type="text" authority="marcrelator" authorityURI="http://id.loc.gov/vocabulary/relators" valueURI="http://id.loc.gov/vocabulary/relators/cre">creator</roleTerm>
    </role>
    <namePart>Roback, Andrew</namePart>
  </name>
  <name>
    <role>
      <roleTerm type="text" authority="marcrelator" authorityURI="http://id.loc.gov/vocabulary/relators" valueURI="http://id.loc.gov/vocabulary/relators/cre">creator</roleTerm>
    </role>
    <namePart>Hemphill, Libby</namePart>
  </name>
  <abstract>Using tweets posted with #SOPA and #PIPA hashtags and directed at members of Congress, we identify six strategies constituents employ when using Twitter to lobby their elected officials. In contrast to earlier research, we found that constituents do use Twitter to try to engage their officials and not just as a “soapbox” to express their opinions.</abstract>
  <note type="provenance">Submitted by Libby Hemphill (lhemphil@iit.edu) on 2012-12-03T21:48:17Z No. of bitstreams: 1 Roback &amp; Hemphill CSCW 2013 Poster.pdf: 112174 bytes, checksum: 366440990d289e79febe83def2fdacf0 (MD5)</note>
  <note type="provenance">Made available in DSpace on 2012-12-03T21:48:17Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 Roback &amp; Hemphill CSCW 2013 Poster.pdf: 112174 bytes, checksum: 366440990d289e79febe83def2fdacf0 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2013</note>
  <originInfo>
    <dateCreated keyDate="yes">2012-12-03</dateCreated>
  </originInfo>
  <originInfo>
    <dateIssued>2013</dateIssued>
  </originInfo>
  <physicalDescription>
    <form>Manuscript</form>
  </physicalDescription>
  <identifier type="hdl">http://hdl.handle.net/10560/2888</identifier>
  <accessCondition type="useAndReproduction" displayLabel="cc">Attribution-NonCommercial 3.0 United States</accessCondition>
  <accessCondition type="useAndReproduction" displayLabel="ccURI">http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/us/</accessCondition>
  <subject>
    <topic>twitter</topic>
  </subject>
  <subject>
    <topic>Congress</topic>
  </subject>
  <subject>
    <topic>political communication</topic>
  </subject>
  <subject>
    <topic>social media</topic>
  </subject>
  <typeOfResource authority="aat" valueURI="http://vocab.getty.edu/aat/300048715">Article</typeOfResource>
  <physicalDescription>
    <digitalOrigin>born digital</digitalOrigin>
    <internetMediaType>application/pdf</internetMediaType>
  </physicalDescription>
  <accessCondition type="useAndReproduction" displayLabel="rightsstatements.org">In Copyright</accessCondition>
  <accessCondition type="useAndReproduction" displayLabel="rightsstatements.orgURI">http://rightsstatements.org/page/InC/1.0/</accessCondition>
  <accessCondition type="restrictionOnAccess">Open Access</accessCondition>
  <name type="corporate">
    <namePart>HUM / Humanities</namePart>
    <affiliation>Illinois Institute of Technology</affiliation>
    <role>
      <roleTerm type="text">Affiliated department</roleTerm>
    </role>
  </name>
</mods>
