creator Ladenson, Robert creator Ladenson, Robert This monograph offers guidance for special education due process hearing officers in their efforts to write good due process decisions. It has four sections dealing respectively with: - Summary and explanation of factual findings; - Justification of legal conclusions; - Framing and determination of rulings and orders; - Writing choices in a special education due process opinion as to word selection, organizational structure, style, rhetoric, and tone. The monograph is not intended to replace, but instead to supplement, the use of comprehensive summaries of substantive and procedural special education law. It aims to address an essential, yet presently unmet need – for an educational approach that helps special education due process hearing officers to focus critical reflection upon processes involved both in thinking through issues in a case and finding words to express the conclusions arrived at in writing a decision. Submitted by Kelly Laas (laas@iit.edu) on 2011-10-06T15:39:31Z No. of bitstreams: 3 license_text: 23084 bytes, checksum: 24f8f2abcc0a604d988d82a6620de1dd (MD5) license_rdf: 23631 bytes, checksum: 0ebfb63a28ea1d6f51b802c66ebf651c (MD5) Ladenson Good Due Process Decisions.pdf: 193998 bytes, checksum: 4a5ec87bf1d32e8104268c1a5318920c (MD5) Made available in DSpace on 2011-10-06T15:39:31Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 3 license_text: 23084 bytes, checksum: 24f8f2abcc0a604d988d82a6620de1dd (MD5) license_rdf: 23631 bytes, checksum: 0ebfb63a28ea1d6f51b802c66ebf651c (MD5) Ladenson Good Due Process Decisions.pdf: 193998 bytes, checksum: 4a5ec87bf1d32e8104268c1a5318920c (MD5) Previous issue date: 2011 2011 2011

typescript

special education hearing officer due process education special education Technical report born digital application/pdf In Copyright http://rightsstatements.org/page/InC/1.0/ Open Access CSEP / Center for the Study of Ethics in the Professions Illinois Institute of Technology Affiliated department http://hdl.handle.net/10560/islandora:10196