<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<mods xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:xs="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:mods="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3" version="3.7" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3 http://www.loc.gov/standards/mods/v3/mods-3-7.xsd">
  <titleInfo>
    <title>Doing the Minimum as an Alternative to Exercising Reasonable Care in a Professional Role</title>
  </titleInfo>
  <name>
    <role>
      <roleTerm type="text" authority="marcrelator" authorityURI="http://id.loc.gov/vocabulary/relators" valueURI="http://id.loc.gov/vocabulary/relators/cre">creator</roleTerm>
    </role>
    <namePart>Davis, Michael</namePart>
  </name>
  <abstract>In the second edition of ENGINEERING ETHICS:CASES AND CONCEPTS (Wadsworth, 2000), Harris, Pritchard, and Rabins distinguish three conceptions of professional responsibility: the "minimalist," the "reasonable care" and the "good works". Of the minimalist conception, they say (among other things) that it "holds that engineers have a duty to conform to the standard operating procedures of their profession and to fulfill the basic duties of their job defied by the terms of their employment." (p.101). In contrast, the reasonable care conception "moves beyond the minimalist view's concern to 'stay out of trouble'. (p.103) I will argue that this distinction is incoherent, that the "minimalist conception" (so defined) necessarily includes not only reasonable care but at least some of what Harris, Pritchard, and Rabins classify as "good works". I conclude with a suggestion for what they might say instead about a certain "minimalist attitude" one finds in business (though it truth, it should be called "sub-minimalist".</abstract>
  <note type="provenance">Submitted by Kelly Laas (laas@iit.edu) on 2011-10-06T19:06:09Z No. of bitstreams: 3 license_text: 23084 bytes, checksum: 24f8f2abcc0a604d988d82a6620de1dd (MD5) license_rdf: 23631 bytes, checksum: 0ebfb63a28ea1d6f51b802c66ebf651c (MD5) Doing_the_Minimum.pdf: 3704731 bytes, checksum: e9d481686e59aa7b33e8d02d223a28f2 (MD5)</note>
  <note type="provenance">Made available in DSpace on 2011-10-06T19:06:09Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 3 license_text: 23084 bytes, checksum: 24f8f2abcc0a604d988d82a6620de1dd (MD5) license_rdf: 23631 bytes, checksum: 0ebfb63a28ea1d6f51b802c66ebf651c (MD5) Doing_the_Minimum.pdf: 3704731 bytes, checksum: e9d481686e59aa7b33e8d02d223a28f2 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2000</note>
  <abstract>Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Association for Professional and Practical Ethics (A.P.P.E.), Washington, DC, February 26, 2000.</abstract>
  <originInfo>
    <dateCreated keyDate="yes">2008</dateCreated>
  </originInfo>
  <originInfo>
    <dateIssued>2000</dateIssued>
  </originInfo>
  <physicalDescription>
    <form>printed matter</form>
  </physicalDescription>
  
  <subject>
    <topic>engineering ethics</topic>
    <topic>professional ethics</topic>
    <topic>professional responsibility</topic>
    <topic>business ethics</topic>
  </subject>
  <typeOfResource>Presentation</typeOfResource>
  <physicalDescription>
    <digitalOrigin>born digital</digitalOrigin>
    <internetMediaType>application/pdf</internetMediaType>
  </physicalDescription>
  <accessCondition type="useAndReproduction" displayLabel="rightsstatements.org">In Copyright</accessCondition>
  <accessCondition type="useAndReproduction" displayLabel="rightsstatements.orgURI">http://rightsstatements.org/page/InC/1.0/</accessCondition>
  <accessCondition type="restrictionOnAccess">Open Access</accessCondition>
  <name type="corporate">
    <namePart>CSEP / Center for the Study of Ethics in the Professions</namePart>
    <affiliation>Illinois Institute of Technology</affiliation>
    <role>
      <roleTerm type="text">Affiliated department</roleTerm>
    </role>
  </name>
<identifier type="hdl">http://hdl.handle.net/10560/islandora:10172</identifier></mods>
