
<oai_dc:dc xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
  <dc:title>REVISITING MODERNIST MASS-HOUSING: RESIDENTS AS ACTIVE AGENTS OF CHANGE</dc:title>
  <dc:creator>Shah, Nadia</dc:creator>
  <dc:subject>Architecture</dc:subject>
  <dc:subject>Urban planning</dc:subject>
  <dc:subject>active agency of residents</dc:subject>
  <dc:subject>appropriation</dc:subject>
  <dc:subject>adaptation and expansion</dc:subject>
  <dc:subject>post-colonial nation building</dc:subject>
  <dc:subject>postwar international development and architectural modernism</dc:subject>
  <dc:subject>postwar modernist mass-housing</dc:subject>
  <dc:subject>standardized</dc:subject>
  <dc:subject>normative and prescriptive housing solutions for the low-income and refugee populations</dc:subject>
  <dc:description>In this PhD research, I have examined the modernist approach of mid-20thcentury mass housing projects against the backdrop of post-colonial nation building
and the need for housing refugees through resettlement projects after World War II. In
this epoch most of the refugees were accommodated in newly decolonized nation
states that were struggling to create their national identity as ‘modern&apos;. It was at
this critical moment in history, when the West assumed the paternalistic role of
development of the so-called ‘Third World’, the ‘Global South’ or the ‘Underdeveloped
Nations’, that they defined what is &apos;modern&apos; using Western standards of ‘normalcy’.
Aboard this international development project, architectural modernism’s response
was to ‘generalize problems’ and provide ‘normative prescriptions’ as solutions based on
rational models. I have reviewed the timeline of modernist ideas that led to mass housing
and the associated notion of ‘normalization of space,’ presenting three scales used to
organize society: regional planning, land use zoning, and mass-produced architecture, as a
prescriptive process.
I have examined architecture’s ‘normalization’ as a source of conflict for nation
states in their process of national identity formation. I argue that the pedagogy of both
modernism and late modernism, presented cultural distinction as an intermediary
condition that was subject to change. In particular, modernist architecture engaged with
the “concept of normalcy” for the formation of a modern society through spatial and
physical organization. Using the case study of Pakistan, I present how this notion was at
odds with Pakistani nationalism, since the country was created on the premise to house a traditional society.
I have used the example of the Greek architect, Constantinos Doxiadis and his
trajectory of late modernism for solving the global housing crisis after World War II.
For this purpose, I present the case of a particular post World War II refugee
resettlement project called Korangi Town in Karachi Pakistan. This case is studied in the
light of modernist planning and architectural models to examine what was proposed,
designed, and predicted by this professional architect and how Korangi Town has
evolved in the past sixty years. The objective is to see how the new normal
architecture and planning standards of the West were received in the non-Western
culture? The case study of Korangi Town reveals that the residents of a locale may
organize themselves along cultural and ethnic lines, deviating from implemented
prescriptive and normative solutions.
The changes that the residents made to their built environment through the
processes identified as ‘appropriation’, ‘adaptation’ and ‘expansion’ in the dissertation
are interpreted as the signs of their active agency. The residents’ agency emerges to
reshape their built environs to meet their cultural and individual needs, but most of
all their economic needs. These observations show that rather than being passive
recipients of ready-made and prescriptive solutions, the residents were active agents in
adjusting and adding to their environment.
Inhabitants’ active agency needs attention by the planning and architecture
professions to assure that environments intended for them have their meaningful input.
This dissertation raises questions about how these professions can support this active
agency from the beginning and through the planning and design processes.</dc:description>
  <dc:contributor>Sabatino, Michelangelo</dc:contributor>
  <dc:date>2021</dc:date>
  <dc:type>Dissertation</dc:type>
  <dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format>
  <dc:identifier>islandora:1011826</dc:identifier>
  <dc:identifier>http://hdl.handle.net/10560/islandora:1011826</dc:identifier>
  <dc:source></dc:source>
  <dc:source>Illinois Institute of Technology</dc:source>
  <dc:source>ARCH / Architecture</dc:source>
  <dc:source></dc:source>
  <dc:language>en</dc:language>
  <dc:rights>In
                Copyright</dc:rights>
  <dc:rights>http://rightsstatements.org/page/InC/1.0/</dc:rights>
  <dc:rights>Restricted Access</dc:rights>
</oai_dc:dc>
