<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<mods xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:xs="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:mods="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3" version="3.7" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3 http://www.loc.gov/standards/mods/v3/mods-3-7.xsd">
  <titleInfo>
    <title>Professionalism Among Chinese Engineers: An Empirical Study: Effective raw data(229)</title>
  </titleInfo>
  <name>
    <role>
      <roleTerm type="text" authority="marcrelator" authorityURI="http://id.loc.gov/vocabulary/relators" valueURI="http://id.loc.gov/vocabulary/relators/cre">creator</roleTerm>
    </role>
    <namePart>Wei, Lina</namePart>
  </name>
  <name>
    <role>
      <roleTerm type="text" authority="marcrelator" authorityURI="http://id.loc.gov/vocabulary/relators" valueURI="http://id.loc.gov/vocabulary/relators/cre">creator</roleTerm>
    </role>
    <namePart>Davis, Michael</namePart>
  </name>
  <abstract>This is a copy of a dataset - in English and Chinese - completed in 2018 looking at concepts of professionalism. Following on the Davis, Zhang survey of 2016, this study continues to evaluate the claim that China has a profession of engineering (as defined by Davis) with a larger, better educated, demographically different pool of two hundred and twenty-nine Chinese engineers, using more specific and deeper questions about “profession”, for example, by adding the investigation of competence (the discipline of engineering)—the perceived knowledge, skill, and judgment of the interviewees as evidence of one aspect of profession. The dataset includes a copy of the questionnaire in Chinese and English, as well as both the entire dataset of surveyed individuals as well as the data from individuals who were deemed to have enough experience in engineering to be included in the final data set analyzed.</abstract>
  <note type="provenance">Submitted by Kelly Laas (laas@iit.edu) on 2019-03-19T14:54:49Z No. of bitstreams: 5 license_rdf: 1232 bytes, checksum: bb87e2fb4674c76d0d2e9ed07fbb9c86 (MD5) questionnaire （English version）.pdf: 113522 bytes, checksum: 7bbcfea3708cde44bcbb3d621876e37f (MD5) Questionnaire (Chinese version) .pdf: 175165 bytes, checksum: b1bce760aded909d3d1b004e67ca5b1d (MD5) Effective raw data(229).xlsx: 72205 bytes, checksum: 7833dfbb2fe0dbc770285466f86a92b1 (MD5) total raw data(271).xlsx: 84499 bytes, checksum: e42b59f440e7a2580b68e96093e2565e (MD5)</note>
  <note type="provenance">Made available in DSpace on 2019-03-19T14:54:50Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 5 license_rdf: 1232 bytes, checksum: bb87e2fb4674c76d0d2e9ed07fbb9c86 (MD5) questionnaire （English version）.pdf: 113522 bytes, checksum: 7bbcfea3708cde44bcbb3d621876e37f (MD5) Questionnaire (Chinese version) .pdf: 175165 bytes, checksum: b1bce760aded909d3d1b004e67ca5b1d (MD5) Effective raw data(229).xlsx: 72205 bytes, checksum: 7833dfbb2fe0dbc770285466f86a92b1 (MD5) total raw data(271).xlsx: 84499 bytes, checksum: e42b59f440e7a2580b68e96093e2565e (MD5) Previous issue date: 2019-03-18</note>
  <originInfo>
    <dateCreated keyDate="yes">2019-03-18</dateCreated>
  </originInfo>
  <originInfo>
    <copyrightDate encoding="iso8601">2019</copyrightDate>
  </originInfo>
  <originInfo>
    <dateIssued>2019-03-18</dateIssued>
  </originInfo>
  <physicalDescription>
    <form>other</form>
  </physicalDescription>
  
  <language>
    <languageTerm type="code" authority="rfc3066">en</languageTerm>
  </language>
  <accessCondition type="useAndReproduction" displayLabel="cc">Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 United States</accessCondition>
  <accessCondition type="useAndReproduction" displayLabel="ccURI">http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/us/</accessCondition>
  <subject>
    <topic>Engineering Ethics</topic>
  </subject>
  <subject>
    <topic>Engineering Ethics</topic>
    <topic>Professionalism,</topic>
  </subject>
  <typeOfResource authority="coar" valueURI="http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_ddb1">Dataset</typeOfResource>
  <physicalDescription>
    <digitalOrigin>born digital</digitalOrigin>
    <internetMediaType>application/pdf</internetMediaType>
  </physicalDescription>
  <accessCondition type="useAndReproduction" displayLabel="rightsstatements.org">In Copyright</accessCondition>
  <accessCondition type="useAndReproduction" displayLabel="rightsstatements.orgURI">http://rightsstatements.org/page/InC/1.0/</accessCondition>
  <accessCondition type="restrictionOnAccess">Open Access</accessCondition>
  <name type="corporate">
    <namePart>CSEP / Center for the Study of Ethics in the Professions</namePart>
    <affiliation>Illinois Institute of Technology</affiliation>
    <role>
      <roleTerm type="text">Affiliated department</roleTerm>
    </role>
  </name>
<identifier type="hdl">http://hdl.handle.net/10560/islandora:1000027</identifier></mods>
